0%
Loading date... |

Norway’s Goal Disallowed for Haaland Foul Before Corner Kick Sparks Debate Over New IFAB Rule

Bellingham and Saka protest Heggem's goal; referee disallows Norway's goal against England based on a new rule — Photo: Paul Childs/Reuters
Bellingham and Saka protest Heggem's goal; referee disallows Norway's goal against England based on a new rule — Photo: Paul Childs/Reuters
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Norway’s Disallowed Goal Exposes New IFAB Rule, Ignites Football Debate.

The latest international match window highlighted a significant nuance in football rules, altering the landscape for potentially decisive plays. Heggem’s goal, which could have given Norway the lead against England, was rightfully disallowed due to a foul by Erling Haaland committed before the corner kick. The decision, which resulted in a 1-1 draw, underscores the application of a new directive from the International Football Association Board (IFAB), generating heated discussions among fans and experts.

The New Interpretation in Play

Until last European season, an infringement like Haaland’s, committed before the ball was in play, might not have been penalized. However, French referee Clément Turpin, following a VAR review, applied the new rule, which has been validated for this World Cup. From now on, fouls occurring before set pieces, such as corner kicks, free kicks, or penalty kicks, can lead to the play being disallowed and a retake. In this specific case, after the corner kick was retaken, England regained possession, and the goal did not materialize.

ADVERTISEMENT
Commercial opportunity

Advertise with Mengão 360

Connect your brand with a passionate football community. Explore our advertising formats and commercial opportunities.

EXPLORE OPPORTUNITIES

PC de Oliveira, a former referee and refereeing commentator, praised the application of the new rule.
“An attacking foul before the ball is in play, with a direct impact on a goal-scoring or penalty-kick opportunity. VAR recommends a review, and the corner kick or free kick must be retaken. This rule was implemented due to attackers blocking defenders and goalkeepers, preventing them from properly contesting the ball. See Arsenal’s goals in the Premier League,” he explained, emphasizing that the decision was correct.

Impact and Future Applications

This episode marked the first time the new rule was invoked in a goal-scoring play during the tournament, highlighting its potential impact on scores and match dynamics. The IFAB circular, published in May, also introduced the so-called “Vini Jr. Law,” which stipulates expulsion for players who cover their mouths when arguing with opponents. We have already seen two expulsions under this rule in the World Cup, with Miguel Almirón and Piero Hincapié being punished. The referee’s decision in the Norway incident not only validated a new interpretation but also opened a range of questions about how this rule will be applied in other crucial moments of football, shaping how teams prepare and contest every inch of the field.

GET NEWS FROM M360

The latest Flamengo news delivered directly to your inbox.

You can unsubscribe at any time.

What are you looking for?

Search and find content across the entire portal.

ADVERTISEMENT
Mega Bolão 360

GET NEWS FROM M360

The latest Flamengo news delivered directly to your inbox.

You can unsubscribe at any time.

Archives

ADVERTISEMENT
🏆 MEGA BOLÃO 360O maior torneio da história:

Crie seu bolão grátis e acompanhe tudo em tempo real.

Entrar na comunidade
ADVERTISEMENT
💬
COMUNIDADE OFICIALEntre na comunidade Mega Bolão 360

Novidades, notícias e atualizações das competições em um só lugar.

WHATSAPP ›
🇧🇷PT